What about the various free PCB design tools available Normally, I dont recommend any of them because they force you to use their PCB production services. Intel 945 Linux Driver. That may be okay for a hobby project but not if you plan to ever mass produce your product. These free tools usually lack the ability to output the PCB layout as Gerber files which is necessary if you want the flexibility to manufacture your boards via any vendor. One exception is Easy. EDA which is an online PCB design tool that not only includes schematic and PCB layout design, but also circuit simulation capabilities. Easy. EDA is very intuitive to use, features Gerber file output, and best of all is totally free. EDAElectronic Design Automation. Cadence Orcad Mentor Graphics PDAS. Mentor Graphics Expedition Pcb TutorialPCB Design Software Pricing Comparison. Diptrace Full. No limits1,1. Eagle. No limits6. Cadence Or. Cad PCB Designer. No limits2,3. 00. Altium Designer. No limits7,2. Diptrace Starter. Diptrace Standard. Diptrace Extended. Easy. EDANo limits. Free. So Who Exactly Needs PCB Design Software Lets look at the types of people most likely to need a PCB design tool. Ill discuss four groups of people likely to use circuit design software, although Im sure there are several more GROUP 1 Corporate engineers Most established companies can easily afford to spend thousands of dollars on software. Altium is probably the right choice for you. GROUP 2 Independent freelance engineers If you already know how to use Altium from a previous corporate job, and you can afford it, then Altium may be your best choice. If not, then then Dip. Trace is probably your best choice, unless you need to collaborate with other engineers. If you collaborating with other engineers is critical then youll probably be better off with one of the more popular packages. GROUP 3 Engineer entrepreneurs If you have prior experience designing electronics or wish to learn how then you may be better off designing your product yourself. Or at least as much as possible. Dip. Trace is definitely the way to go for you GROUP 4 Electronic hobbyists and hackers Whether youre developing a circuit for fun or for profit, Dip. Trace is easily the best design package for you. The Most Important Criteria for PCB Design Software. For me, as well as most entrepreneurs and a majority of freelance engineers, there are five primary criteria that matter most when selecting a circuit design software package CRITERIA 1 Must be intuitive to use Dip. Trace is the clear winner when it comes to being intuitive to use. Using Dip. Trace youll be able to begin designing your circuit almost immediately with a very minimal learning curve. No need to waste hours reading a boring manual with Dip. Trace. Eagle is the clear loser in regards to being intuitive to use. It has the worst user interface of just about any design package Ive ever used. Eagle is utterly frustrating to learn and youll waste days or weeks trying to learn it. In fact, it will probably be many weeks before you are actually comfortable with it, if ever. CRITERIA 2 Must be reasonably priced Dip. Trace is easily the most affordable PCB design package. It is only half the price of Eagle, or only an eighth the price of Altium. Dip. Trace also has a low barrier to entry because you can begin with their low cost Starter version and upgrade your way up as needed. CRITERIA 3 Needs to have all of the features youll ever need, but not every feature you could ever imagine There is no clear winner here, and it really depends on your needs. That being said, Dip. Trace has had every feature Ive ever needed. CRITERIA 4 Ideally it should be a standard and in widespread use. Altium is the clear winner for this criteria, with Eagle in second, Or. Cad in third place, and Dip. Trace coming in last. CRITERIA 5 Large libraries of components available. All four packages come with huge libraries of components. Large libraries are critical because creating new components can introduce errors that wont be captured by any of the verification tools. That being said, regardless of the package, youll eventually need to create some custom components yourself. Because they are so popular, Altium and Eagle are probably the winners for this criteria because component manufacturers are more likely to provide a component library for one of these two packages. This has never really been an issue for me and Ive found Dip. Traces libraries to be quite extensive. The Ultimate Cost of Complicated Software. While designing microchips for Texas Instruments TI we used a package from Cadence makers of Or. Cad which cost TI probably millions in licensing fees. Honestly, it was horrible software that was very confusing and difficult to use. So it also cost an incredible amount in lost design time from engineers. In general, it took new designers several months to get really efficient in its use. Not so with Dip. Trace. If youve ever done any circuit design or PCB layout you can sit down with Dip. Trace and be producing quality designs within a few hours. At the other extreme is Eagle which will cost you weeks of lost design time. Can you tell I really dont like Eagle Some Details About Dip. PCB Design Layout Services. Freedom CAD specializes in high performance PCB physical design layout while utilizing high end software programs complemented by leading edge hardware. Our capabilities encompass the full design flow from start to finish including schematic capture, library development, data base construction and verification, signal integrity, EMI checking and verification complementing the PCB layout. With over 1,0. 00 years of combined design experience, our design team has the ability to focus their attention on detailed and quality to support projects of any size and complexity. We appreciate the importance of customer service in this ever changing environment and strive to become a value added and seamless extension to your engineering team. Our experience in large complex, rules driven designs allows us to support the engineers in translating their electrical schematics into a physical board layout that can be fabricated, assembled, and tested.